Игорь Рассоха

       Библиотека портала ХРОНОС: всемирная история в интернете

       РУМЯНЦЕВСКИЙ МУЗЕЙ

> ПОРТАЛ RUMMUSEUM.RU > БИБЛИОТЕКА ХРОНОСА > КНИЖНЫЙ КАТАЛОГ Р >


Игорь Рассоха

2010 г.

БИБЛИОТЕКА ХРОНОСА


БИБЛИОТЕКА
А: Айзатуллин, Аксаков, Алданов...
Б: Бажанов, Базарный, Базили...
В: Васильев, Введенский, Вернадский...
Г: Гавриил, Галактионова, Ганин, Гапон...
Д: Давыдов, Дан, Данилевский, Дебольский...
Е, Ё: Елизарова, Ермолов, Ермушин...
Ж: Жид, Жуков, Журавель...
З: Зазубрин, Зензинов, Земсков...
И: Иванов, Иванов-Разумник, Иванюк, Ильин...
К: Карамзин, Кара-Мурза, Караулов...
Л: Лев Диакон, Левицкий, Ленин...
М: Мавродин, Майорова, Макаров...
Н: Нагорный Карабах..., Назимова, Несмелов, Нестор...
О: Оболенский, Овсянников, Ортега-и-Гассет, Оруэлл...
П: Павлов, Панова, Пахомкина...
Р: Радек, Рассел, Рассоха...
С: Савельев, Савинков, Сахаров, Север...
Т: Тарасов, Тарнава, Тартаковский, Татищев...
У: Уваров, Усманов, Успенский, Устрялов, Уткин...
Ф: Федоров, Фейхтвангер, Финкер, Флоренский...
Х: Хилльгрубер, Хлобустов, Хрущев...
Ц: Царегородцев, Церетели, Цеткин, Цундел...
Ч: Чемберлен, Чернов, Чижов...
Ш, Щ: Шамбаров, Шаповлов, Швед...
Э: Энгельс...
Ю: Юнгер, Юсупов...
Я: Яковлев, Якуб, Яременко...

Родственные проекты:
ХРОНОС
ФОРУМ
ИЗМЫ
ДО 1917 ГОДА
РУССКОЕ ПОЛЕ
ДОКУМЕНТЫ XX ВЕКА
ПОНЯТИЯ И КАТЕГОРИИ

Игорь Рассоха

Методика выявления древнейшего родства языков путем сравнения их базовой лексики с ностратической и сино-кавказской реконструкциями

Выявление дальнего родства языков методом сравнения 100-понятийных списков их базовой лексики с соответствующими по значению списками слов ностратической и сино-кавказской реконструкций

Method of ancient linguistic affinity detection by comparing their basic vocabulary with Nostratic and Sino-Caucasian reconstructions

Summary

      The method is based on the achievements of modern comparative studies such as Nostratic and Sino-Caucasian reconstructions and Swadesh 100-meaning list transformed here to 100-concept list. The 100-concept lists of reconstructions were compared with 100-meaning lists of real languages to identify the phonetic similarity. The similarity was defined as actual or likely present obvious phonetic similarity. Possible phonetic conversions and regular correspondences were not taken into account. In addition to the actual 100- meaning lists of modern languages to determine the extent of random coincidences ("noise") are not associated with semantic relatedness, there were used "overturned" (moved to 50 rooms) lists for the same languages.

It was found that the number of synonyms in the 100- meaning lists of real languages are not fundamentally affect the outcome. It was shown that closely related languages have very similar number of matches.

Almost all the real languages show number of matches with Nostratic vocabulary that was significantly higher then "noise". This is interpreted as evidence of distant linguistic affinity of almost all the languages of the Earth, corresponding affinities for Y-chromosome. We propose to call such languages as Noah-languages.

However the language Katcha (Southern Sudan) show number of matches on a "noise level". We propose to call such presumably not-Noah-languages as Rephaim-languages.

A number of different languages of the Earth (incl. Sino-Caucasian) showed the number of matches with the Nostratic reconstruction, that was significantly greater than that of conventional Noah-languages, but less than the actual Nostratic. Such languages are proposed to call Boreal.

Chukchi-Kamchatka, Nivkh, Sumerian, Penutian, Aymara, Mande, Gur, Senufo, West Atlantic, Kru, Adamawa-Ubangi were detected as obviously Nostratic together with already recognized Nostratic languages. Nostratic nature of Itelmen, Aleut and Eskimo languages was not confirmed.

Basque, Tlingit, Nambikwara were proved as obviously Sino-Caucasian in addition to already recognized. Kanuri (Saharan), Athabaskan, Ainu and Burushaski showed similarities both to Nostratic and Sino-Caucasian. All other examined languages showed similarity with Sino-Caucasian reconstruction on the "noise level".

The artificial nature of Amerindian, Nilo-Saharan and Niger-Kordofanian (Niger-Congo) language macrofamily was proved.

The hypothesis of identification of the language communities with certain historical and archaeological communities was formulated. Spread of Noah-language was proposed to associate with the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic. Spread of Boreal languages was associated with the proliferation of Late Paleolithic technologies of flakes and plates. It is proposed to consider as archaeological marker of ancient Sino-Caucasian nations the cult of the snake / dragon and the spiral ornament of cultures painted pottery. The resettlement of Nostratic tribes in West Africa through the Neolithic Sahara is shown.

Вернуться к оглавлению

И.Н. Рассоха. Методика выявления древнейшего родства языков путем сравнения их базовой лексики с ностратической и сино-кавказской реконструкциями. Харьков, ХНАМГ, 2010.

 

 

БИБЛИОТЕКА ХРОНОСА

Редактор Вячеслав Румянцев

При цитировании всегда ставьте ссылку